This curtailment follows several issued in April:
- 3rd: Curtailment order concerning diversions from the Antelope Creek Watershed.
- 17th: Curtailment order concerning diversions from the Deer Creek Watershed.
- 23rd: Curtailment notice concerning diversions from the Scott River Watershed.
- 23rd: Curtailment notice concerning diversions from the San Joaquin River Watershed.
- 30th: Term 91 curtailment notice concerning diversions from the San Joaquin Delta Watershed.
The curtailment orders, while issued purportedly in accordance with state law, have issued in such a way that their purpose is to create debate about the supremacy of Pre-1914 rights.
Concurrently during April the Department of Water Resources (DWR) held listening sessions concerning the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act have yielded discussion from the public, primarily environmental activists, about groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) regulating agricultural uses of water through groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) - either by decreasing extractions by blaming agriculture for water quality issues or setting tiered extraction fees based on the commodity grown. These ideas, unfortunately, are not being rebuffed by DWR as an appropriate exercise of power by GSAs.
The above combines to create great turmoil for agriculture: pitting farmers, ranchers and dairymen with junior rights against those who hold senior pre-1914 rights, and pitting all agricultural users against new local agencies that environmental activists will try to influence to further choke out agriculture.